5 Simple Techniques For case law on gift in cash
5 Simple Techniques For case law on gift in cash
Blog Article
However, in an effort to strike a balance between the rights of citizens as well as the plans that are executed because of the authorities for that welfare, financial development and prosperity of the place, the Court did not produce a definitive ruling on the pending construction of the grid station, but, with the consent of both parties, ordered a review and report of grid project with the National Engineering Services of Pakistan (NESPAK) to advise alterations and location alternatives.
However, If your same person were charged with section three hundred and 302, their defence that they never meant to destroy the person – and that They only planned to injure them or incapacitate them –, will fail, as the elements with the offence only require the intent to cause injury for being proven, not the intention to cause death.
four. It's been noticed by this Court that there can be a delay of one day within the registration of FIR which hasn't been explained from the complainant. Moreover, there is no eye-witness of your alleged prevalence plus the prosecution is relying on the witnesses of extra judicial confession. The evidence of extra judicial confession from the petitioners is tendered by Ghulam Dastigir and Mohammad Akram through their statements recorded under Section 161, Cr.P.C., on 06.02.2018. Both of these namely Ghulam Dastigir and Mohammad Akram occurred to be the real brothers in the deceased but they didn't react in any respect on the confessional statements of the petitioners and calmly noticed them leaving, one after the other, without even moving an inch. They have not mentioned in their statements that the accused held some weapon when they visited them to confess their guilt about the murder of Ghulam Farid which could have precluded these witnesses from apprehending the petitioners. Their conduct does not search much inspiring or natural. The petitioner, namely, Mst. Mubeena Bibi was arrested on fourteen.02.2018 and there is no explanation as to why her arrest wasn't effected after making in the alleged extra judicial confession. It's been held on so many events that extra judicial confession of the accused is usually a weak type of evidence which might be manoeuvred with the prosecution in any case where direct connecting evidence does not come their way. The prosecution can also be relying on the evidence of Murid Hussain and Muhammad Afzal which is equally fragile, as both the witnesses Murid Hussain and Muhammad Afzal did not say a word regarding existence of some light with the place, where they allegedly saw the petitioners alongside one another on the motorcycle at four.
Information on accessing opinions and case-related documents for that Supreme Court of your United States is out there on the court’s website.
R.O, Office, Gujranwala and the police officials didn't inform him that the identification parade with the accused has not been conducted still. In the instant case, now the accused made an effort to consider advantage of the program aired by SAMAA News, wherein the picture with the petitioner was broadly circulated. The police should not have uncovered the identity of your accused through electronic media. The regulation lends assurance to the accused that the identity should not be subjected to the witnesses, particularly for the witness to determine the accused before the Magistrate. The C.P.O, Gujranwala present in court, stated that the Investigating Officer put a mask over the accused to conceal their identity and generated pics. In addition to, the images shown within the media expose that a mask was not placed over the accused to hide his identity right until he was put up for an identification parade. Making pictures on the accused publically, both by showing the same into the witness or by publicizing the same in almost any newspaper or system, would create doubt from the proceedings with the identification parade. The Investigating Officer has to make certain that there isn't any probability for that witness to see the accused before going towards the identification parade. The accused should not be shown to your witness in person or through any other manner, i.e., photograph, video-graph, or maybe the push or electronic media. check here Given the reasons elaborated above, the case against the petitioner needs further probe and inquiry within the meanings of Section 497(2), Cr.P.C.
For that foregoing reasons the moment suit is dismissed with no order as to cost. Office to prepare decree in the above mentioned terms. Read more
ninety six . Const. P. 4965/2023 (D.B.) Saleem Khan V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It truly is well-settled that when thinking of the case of regular promotion of civil servants, the competent authority should consider the benefit of all the eligible candidates and after due deliberations, to grant promotion to such eligible candidates that are found to be most meritorious amongst them. Because the petitioner was held for being senior to his colleagues who were promoted in BS-19, the petitioner was overlooked with the respondent department just to increase favor to your blue-eyed candidate based on OPS, which is apathy over the part of the respondent department.
لاہور ہائیکورٹ نے قرار دیا ہے کہ پاکستان میں لوگوں کو جھوٹے مقدمات میں ملوث کر دینے کی شکایت عام ہے عدالت نے حکم جاری کیا ہے................
department concerned shall present the complete list of ACRs of the concerned officer to DPC nicely in advance cases for promotin(Promotion)
If that judgment goes to appeal, the appellate court will have the chance to review both the precedent and the case under appeal, perhaps overruling the previous case law by setting a fresh precedent of higher authority. This may possibly transpire several times given that the case works its way through successive appeals. Lord Denning, first of the High Court of Justice, later from the Court of Appeal, provided a famous example of this evolutionary process in his growth in the concept of estoppel starting from the High Trees case.
Alternative Punishment: In a few cases, the court may perhaps have the discretion to award life imprisonment being an alternative into the death penalty. Life imprisonment involves the offender spending the remainder of their life at the rear of bars without the possibility of parole or early release.
To invoke section three hundred and 302 just because death has occurred is the most important tragedy of all. It does the precise opposite of what a legal system is there to complete, i.e. safe its citizens.
The necessary analysis (called ratio decidendi), then constitutes a precedent binding on other courts; further analyses not strictly necessary towards the determination of your current case are called obiter dicta, which constitute persuasive authority but are usually not technically binding. By contrast, decisions in civil legislation jurisdictions are generally shorter, referring only to statutes.[four]